“Governance of Terror” examines government reforms in Australia and Canada Since 9/11
Posted by lawpol on March 19, 2008
Andrew Goldsmith takes a critical look at how governments conceptualize the terrorist threat and
suggests using the Precautionary Principle as a tool “for making sense of, and improving, law reform processes in counterterrorism.” Goldsmith interprets law reforms and decision making in Canada and Australia, and examines what constitutes “expertise,” as well as the “capacity of legislators to scrutinize the arguments of necessity and prognoses of dire threat put forward by executive government.” (Abstract on SSRN)
Goldsmith, Andrew (2008) “The Governance of Terror: Precautionary Logic and Counterterrorist Law Reform After September 11,” Law & Policy 30: 141-167.
This entry was posted on March 19, 2008 at 2:31 pm and is filed under Author meets Reader, L&P Journal news. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.




njrworking said
This is a fascinating article